SLO | EN

Objectives and competences

The course provides an understanding of a multi-faceted system of judicial protection in Europe. It is divided into two parts. The first part explores the system of judicial protection in the European Union, and the second part examines the European Court of Human Rights. Both parts thoroughly examine their mutual interwovenness and the importance of national courts for the effective judicial protection of rights granted by EU law and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Content (Syllabus outline)

A. Judicial protection in the EU 1) Introduction to the EU and its legal order 2) The EU system of judicial protection a) Court of Justice of the EU b) National judges and effective judicial protection in the EU c) Constitutional pluralism in the EU d) Judicial independence and the rule of law e) EU Charter of Fundamental Rights f) Methods of interpretation of EU law g) Binding force of the judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU 3) Judicial dialogue in the EU: preliminary reference procedure 4) Procedures concerning EU acts and institutions a) Actions for annulment of EU acts b) Actions for failure to act c) The plea of illegality d) Preliminary Rulings on the Validity of Union Law e) Contractual and non-contractual liability of the Union f) Opinion on the Compatibility with the Treaties of an International Agreement to be Concluded by the Union g) Other 5) Proceedings against Member States a) Actions against Member States for failure to fulfil obligations b) State liability 6) Private enforcement of EU law A. The Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights 1) The Council of Europe and the EU 2) The ECtHR and the Court of Justice 3) European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms a) Historical development and content b) The ECHR as a source of EU law c) Relationship between the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights 4) Procedures before the ECtHR 5) Advisory opinion of the ECtHR 6) Binding force and effects of ECtHR judgments

Learning and teaching methods

• Lectures with active participation of students, • seminars, • tutorial, • individual research work, • essays and discussions, • dealing with concrete problems, topical issues, relevant cases.

Intended learning outcomes - knowledge and understanding

On completion of this course the student will be able to: • demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the system of judicial protection in the EU and within the framework of the European Court of Human Rights, • demonstrate understanding of the interactions between European courts and national judicial protection, • delineate and critically analyze the jurisdiction of European courts and their methods of interpretation, • demonstrate understanding of the influence of fundamental rights and human rights on the application and interpretation of national law, • use the acquired knowledge of the procedures in practice, • find, understand and apply the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights to concrete cases and in decision-making.

Readings

Obvezna / Mandatory Adams M, de Waele H, Meeusen J and Straetmans G (eds), Judging Europe’s judges. The legitimacy of the case law of the European Court of Justice (Hart Publishing 2015) Arnull A, The European Union and its Court of Justice (OUP 2006) ——, ‘The Principle of Effective Judicial Protection in EU law: an Unruly Horse?’ (2011) 36 ELRev 51 ——, ‘Judicial Review in the European Union’ in Arnull & Chalmers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (OUP 2015) Claes M, 'Luxembourg, here we come? Constitutional courts and the preliminary reference procedure’ (2015) 16(6) GLJ 1331 Conway G, The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice (CUP 2012) Craig P P and de Bu´rca G, EU Law. Text, cases and materials (OUP, 6th ed, 2015) de Bu´rca G, ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: the Court of Justice as a human rights adjudicator?’ (2013) 20(2) MJ 168 Harris D, O'Boyle M, Bates E, and Buckley C, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (OUP 2018) Lacchi C, ‘Multilevel Judicial Protection in the EU and Preliminary References’ (2016) 53 CMLRev 3 679-708 Leczykiewicz D, ‘Effectiveness of EU Law before National Courts: Direct Effect, Effective Judicial Protection and State Liability’ in Arnull & Chalmers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (OUP 2015) Lenaerts K, Maselis I, Gutman K, Ed. Tomasz Nowak J, EU Procedural Law (OUP 2014) Lock T, ‘Is Private Enforcement of EU Law through State liability a Myth? An Assessment 20 years after Francovich’ (2012) 49 CMLRev 1675 O’Leary S, ‘A Tale of Two Cities: Fundamental Rights Protection in Strasbourg and Luxembourg’ (2018) Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2018.3 Tridimas T, The General Principles of EC Law (OUP 2006) Trstenjak V and Brkan M, Pravo EU: Ustavno, procesno in gospodarsko pravo EU (GV Založba 2012) Weingerl P, ‘Sodišče EU kot motor evropeizacije zasebnega prava: ignorantia iuris Europae nocet’ (2014) 33 Pravna praksa II ——, ‘Nov kamenček v mozaiku odnosov med Sodiščem EU in nacionalnimi sodišči’ (2018) 37 Pravna praksa 41/42 27 —— in Hojnik J, ‘Reforma sodnega sistema EU: reševanje kvalitativnih težav s kvantitativnim pristopom?’ (2016) 35 Pravna praksa 2 12-14 Izbirna / optional Albors-Llorens A, ‘Judicial protection before the Court of Justice of the European Union’ in Barnard C, and Peers S, European Union Law (OUP 2014) Avbelj M, Sodno pravo Evropske unije (GV Založba 2011) ——, and Koma´rek, J (eds), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Hart Publishing 2012) Bobek M, 'Landtova´, Holubec, and the problem of an uncooperative court: implications for the preliminary ruling procedure' (2014) 10 EuConst 54 de Bu´rca G, ‘The European Court of Justice and the international legal order after Kadi’ (2010) 51(1) Harvard International Law Journal 1 Douglas-Scott S, ‘A tale of two courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European human rights acquis’ (2006) CMLRev 3 629-665 Frantziou E, ‘The Horizontal Effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU: Rediscovering the Reasons for Horizontality’ (2015) 21 European Law Journal 5 657–679 Lenaerts K, and Gutie´rez-Fons A J, ‘The constitutional allocation of powers and general principles of EU law’ (2010) 47(6) CMLRev 1629 Peers S, and Costa M, ‘Judicial review of EU acts after the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2012) 8 E.C.L. Review 1 82-104 Schűtze R, European Constitutional Law (CUP 2015) Wahl N, and Prete L, ‘The gatekeepers of Article 267 TFEU: On jurisdiction and admissibility of references for preliminary rulings’ (2018) 55 CMLRev 2 511-547 Weatherill S, Law and Values in the European Union (OUP 2016)

Prerequisits

None. Basic knowledge of constitutional law and EU law is helpful.

Comments

Type (examination, oral, coursework, project): • preparation and oral presentation to the class of an essay on the topic agreed upon with the lecturer/teacher • oral examination

  • izr. prof. dr. PETRA WEINGERL

  • Oral examination: 60
  • Essay: 40

  • : 50
  • : 10
  • : 35
  • : 145

  • Slovenian, English
  • Slovenian, English

  • EUROPEAN LEGAL STUDIES - 1st